HAIL, EL ED: We wish to express our condolences to former
Pima County Supervisor Ed Moore and his family as we note
the passing of his mother, an interesting and giving woman.
We can't help but note that Moore, deposed in 1996 by Sharon
Bronson after three terms on the Board of Supervisors, still
lurks. He lunched at La Parrilla Suiza recently with Scott
Egan, the ultra-Irish aide to appointed Supervisor Sugar
Ray Carroll. That puts Moore in contact with four supervisors'
offices. He also dines with Bronson at those neo-rustic far westside
steak houses; plays golf with board Chairman Mikey Boyd;
and chats with his for-public-consumption-nemesis Raul Grijalva.
Hats off to Ed!
THIS BUD'S NOT FOR YOU: E.S. "Bud" Walker,
the good-ole boy Pima County supervisor ousted by Ed Moore
in 1984, returned to board offices last week and got his ass appropriately
kicked 5-0 on a minor rezoning he was fighting.
As outlined by The Weekly last month, Bud tried to block
spaghetti western Joe Cesare from converting a 14-acre
parcel on North Oracle and Chula Vista from zoning for 55 townhomes--which
Bud voted for in 1977--to a less intense and less disruptive office
building and a Manor Care facility for Alzheimer's sufferers.
Even Raul Grijalva subdued his animosity toward Cesare
long enough to make a sensible vote. The two had even sat together
sharing jokes in the county cafeteria the previous day. Raul also
granted an audience to Cowboy Bud, who lives west of the Cesare
property. But it didn't help that Bud hired former one-term Supervisor
Ron Asta, now a Rezonings-R-Us dude, to help crap on Cesare's
plans. Bud spent the morning with a few other neighborhood types
bad-mouthing Cesare, who, amazingly enough, didn't have it coming
on this one. Bud spent part of the subsequent public hearing cussing
Cesare, his former big-time political benefactor.
These nouveau NIMBYs were so stupid and arrogant that they even
told renowned activist "Citizen" Samuel Winchester
Morey to clam up. Bud continued his tasteless display by being
nasty to Cesare's kid, Jeff, a gregarious and exceedingly polite
young man whose attempts to be nice to Walker last week were met
by foul muttering.
You were better, Bud, when you were simply a has-been. Good night,
now.
Meanwhile, Sheriff's Captain/Casas Adobe Mayor/Metro Water Board
member Martha Cramer foolishly whined to the board that
the Cesare zoning, as well as others within the boundaries of
that village-in-limbo, Casas Adobes, should have been delayed
for action by her village's government-in-waiting.
Supervisor Sugar Ray Carroll politely told Cramer: "Forget
about it."
By the way, Marty, you're collecting too many titles. What's
next? Kino Community Hospital CEO?
A BOYD WHO ACTUALLY MAKES MIKEY SEEM ACCEPTABLE: Dumb ex-TV
sports hack Thom Boyd is trying to unseat good-guy Judge
Robert Gibson from Justice of the Peace in the central
and foothills Precinct 1. Propped up by idiots like disgraced
former Constable F. Lee Archer, Thom (go ahead, pronounce
the "Th"--we do) Boyd tried this once before. But he
didn't make it close to the ballot in 1994 because his nominating
petitions were so terribly faulty.
Gibson has served with honor and distinction since defeating
Tom Rallis, also a good JP, in 1986. Gibson is a real-life
hero who was shot and left for dead during a drug bust he was
making as a Sheriff's detective back in the 1970s. Boyd's highlight
is that he read the sports on KVOA in the early 1980s. He was
such a cheerleader that he routinely downplayed the scandals that
engulfed the University of Arizona athletic department. The Skinny
has a long memory, Thom. And it remembers how you told viewers
one night that they would hear no more of one of the scandal offshoots--a
slush fund that helped bounce then-Athletic Director Dave Strack.
The Skinny also remembers, Thom, what a cheap whore you were,
accepting freebies like tennis shoes from companies that wanted
plugs on the air.
If ever there were a clear choice for voters, it's in JP 1.
HOSE JOB: Over the past five years, Tucson Water
has had peak-demand days during which customers used between 141
and 152 million gallons of water. And during some months in summers
past, the city's water system has had to supply from 3.7 billion
to 4.3 billion gallons.
But this past June, pumping from city wells never exceeded 150
million gallons a day and was usually considerably less. The monthly
total of water pumped was just under four billion gallons. Both
of these figures were well within past experience.
So why the potential "water crisis" that was splashed
across the front pages and blathered about on local TV news a
few weeks ago? This despite a much cooler and wetter year than
normal.
A primary cause of the problem was Tucson Water's 1996 decision,
approved by the City Council, that called for drilling
eight new wells in each of the following two years at a total
cost of $4 million. The goal? "To provide the (water) capacity
needed to meet demand," according to city officials.
But then these plans were changed. The two-year budget for drilling
was cut to $1 million, and the number of new wells reduced accordingly.
No city official we've contacted can explain the reason behind
the change. Tucson Water mouthpiece Mitch Basefsky speculated
it was a result of plans to put new wells in service by this summer
at the Avra Valley CAVSARP site (See "Knee Deep in Muddy
Water," Tucson Weekly, July 2).
That idea was dropped in early 1997, yet the city didn't return
to the proposal to drill more wells elsewhere. Basefsky couldn't
explain why.
According to Basefsky, other factors also reduced Tucson's water
supply this year. One is that existing wells are losing pumping
capacity at a rate faster than anticipated, thus producing less
water than anticipated.
Another complication, he says, was that two of the five new wells
counted on for additional water this summer weren't ready in time.
Because of unforeseen delays in the procurement process, one of
these wells didn't come on line until early July, and the other
is just now becoming operational.
Peak demand for water this year has actually been lower than
in four of the preceding five summers. Despite that, water officials
began discussing the possibility of enforcing mandatory conservation
programs, ranging from a ban on all outdoor irrigation to a prohibition
on restaurants serving water unless requested.
But it wasn't increased customer demand that caused this "shortage."
It was Tucson Water's inability to provide the same amount of
water it has in the past.
Tucson Water's solution is to promote CAVSARP. By 2001, eight
wells should be functioning at that controversial facility, producing
water which will quickly become very CAP-like.
Could there be something more than just Tucson Water's typically
poor management involved here?
Rich Wiersma, a member of the city's Citizen Water
Advisory Committee and an outspoken critic of Tucson Water,
thinks so:
"Tucson doesn't have a water-quantity problem," Wiersma
says. "We have a water-delivery problem. Tucson Water has
motivation to create a crisis in order to manipulate people to
accept the inferior quality of chemically treated Central Arizona
Project water."
TALK ABOUT TERRIBLE TIMING: For months, the City Council
has been telling Tucson's police officers there was no
money to pay them more. Now SunTran workers are threatening
to strike unless they get substantially higher raises than offered.
But next week the Council will be discussing the possibility
of spending millions of dollars on new city buildings. The projects
would be funded using general fund revenues--money that can be
spent for any purpose, including raises.
Undoubtedly, Tucson's city employees are generally very well
compensated, especially given the low wages paid to most workersin
private business in this town. Plus, the city benefits package
can't be beat.
But in Tucson city government, buildings often come first, especially
since they are a one-time expense compared to the never-ending
obligation of a pay raise.
We'll see what the City Council does. But the lament that there's
no more money for employees is a very hollow one. It just comes
down to spending priorities.
Meanwhile, has anyone else noticed something strange about this
SunTran situation? A year ago, to end bus drivers and mechanics'
week-long strike, the City Council promised to pay them wages
comparable to what city employees are paid.
Several months ago the Council was told that $1.3 million would
achieve the goal. But apparently nobody bothered to check with
Sun Tran employees to see if they agreed.
So instead of working out this issue before it became a problem,
now the community is facing another bus strike. Looks to us like
what we got here is a failure to communicate.
POLITICS 101 FOR DUMB REPORTERS: The state GOP has
decided to oppose two of this year's seven statewide ballot initiatives,
the so-called "clean elections" proposal and the Grant
Woods-Paul Johnson "open-primary" initiative.
The latter must contend with a watered-down version, cooked up
by the Legislature, which will also be on the ballot as a referendum.
OK, kiddies--and that includes all the kiddies currently carrying
a press pass--here's the difference between an "initiative"
and a "referendum." An initiative is a law proposed
by the folks--or some folks with a checkbook--which gets on the
ballot by petition. There are two kinds of referenda. One is when
citizens pass petitions to "refer" an act of a legislative
body to the people to see if they wish to ratify it. The other
is when the legislative body places a proposal on the ballot for
the people to decide. We have several of the latter this time
around, but some of the boneheads in the media keep calling them
"initiatives." Got it now, dummies?
So the Legislature has this "open-primary" proposal
that would allow independents and minor party members to vote
in the primaries of the Democrats and Republicans. The Johnson-Woods
proposal goes much further, allowing everybody to go back and
forth and vote in whatever primary they want--on the same ballot.
You could pick a Dem for guv, a Rep for senate, and a Whig for
sheriff.
The state GOP, which finds this is as cockamamie as the Legislature,
are to be commended for being honest enough to just oppose it,
while the GOP majority in the Legislature just went for a watered-down--and
stupid--con job. In fact, the state GOP should get some points
for actually having an opinion about something, since the constant
lack of opinions is destroying the major parties here and across
the country.
GROW THIS, GEORGE: Pima County Supervisor Raul Grijalva
has noted that the City of Tucson has done little or nothing to
back up the county's attempts to exert some control over urban
sprawl. He's also pointed out that the Tucson City Council has
been pretty much AWOL from the growth debate.
Tucson Mayor George Miller responded that the city does
a great job of controlling growth, pointing to the many in-fill
projects which he maintains equals sprawl control.
OK, but isn't this the same Mayor who wants to annex more and
more of this whole valley, who has constantly led the biggest
sprawler of all, the City of Tucson, into rolling over for every
outskirts project in sight, from Civano to Rocking K to Starr
Pass? Isn't this the man who wants Oro Valley and Marana to gobble
up Tortolita and Casas Adobes, thus fueling even more insane growth
policies? Isn't this the same Growth Lobby stooge we've been writing
about for years? Give us a break, George--"Sprawl" is
your middle name.
RAINBOW BREAD: One last footnote to the July 4 Rainbow
Gathering in the woods. The Pinetop-Lakeside Town Council
voted to declare the gathering an "emergency," and the
bill for all the extra police protection they decided they needed
was sent to the State Emergency Fund. The tab? Over $70,000, to
be paid for by those of us who live in the rest of the state.
That the cops had little to do goes without saying, and the bill
was for the period June 26 to July 12--one week for each side
of the July 4 event. Since the only criminal of note was caught
by Rainbow security personnel and turned over to law enforcement
authorities, can the Rainbow people collect a piece of this cop
money emergency fund, too?
|