|
Why Hunter S. Thompson Should Stick To Substance Abuse.
By Jim Carvalho
The Rum Diary, by Hunter S. Thompson (Simon & Schuster).
Cloth, $24.
I THINK PERHAPS the only answer is an instant rewrite of The
Rum Diary and a quick sale to the movies. My gimmick is an interracial
orgy that should stand hair on end from London to Long Beach.
The KKK will send goons after me if the thing ever appears.
--Hunter S. Thompson, 1964
THE KLAN WON'T be showing up any time soon. Neither will
the Pulitzer Prize. Forty years after he began writing it, Hunter
S. Thompson's only novel, The Rum Diary, has finally been
published. It's easy to see why it took so long. As artifact and
research tool, The Rum Diary is a valuable companion piece
to the recently published first volume of Thompson's collected
letters, The Proud Highway. As a novel, it's disappointing.
After a comfortable middle-class childhood and an alcohol-soaked
adolescence in Louisville, Kentucky, Hunter Thompson was arrested
for theft, missed his high-school graduation, and was released
from jail on the condition he enlist in the armed forces. After
leaving the Air Force, where he was sports editor of the Eglin
Command Courier, he wrote for various periodicals, struggled
with The Rum Diary, and regularly blew his meager earnings
on liquor, dogs, guns, and ammo (the drugs came later). When he
wasn't writing, drinking, or hunting, Thompson made a nuisance
of himself. In New York City, he amused himself by emptying 50-pound
sacks of lye on innocent bar patrons. In Puerto Rico, he worked
for a struggling English-language newspaper. (His experiences
there are the basis for The Rum Diary.) In Big Sur, he
worked as a security guard for the Esalen Institute, wrote a controversial
exposé on the local arts scene, and ran gays out of the
baths with the help of dogs, clubs, and Joan Baez. And in Central
and South America, while working for the National Observer,
he developed three trademark habits: running up enormous tabs
on his employers' expense accounts, skipping town without paying
his bills, and missing deadlines.
Thompson achieved a breakthrough in 1965 when he wrote a provocative
article on motorcycle gangs for The Nation. The success
of the article led to the publication of his first full-length
book in 1966. Hell's Angels: A Strange and Terrible Saga
was a jaw-dropping insider's look at the violent biker subculture,
widely hailed as a groundbreaking piece of participatory journalism.
(Thompson rode and partied with the Angels until he was stomped.)
Not long afterwards, Thompson began a long and productive relationship
with Rolling Stone, writing one of the magazine's first
non-music articles, "Strange Rumblings in Aztlan."
In 1971, Rolling Stone published Thompson's account of
a drug-crazed road trip to Las Vegas, and as Thompson might say,
the fat hit the fire. Later published in book form, Fear and
Loathing in Las Vegas is Thompson's masterwork, and a trailblazing
piece of literature. In 1971, no one had written or read anything
like it. Subtitled "A Savage Journey to the Heart of the
American Dream," the story begins with one of modern literature's
most memorable opening lines: "We were somewhere around Barstow
on the edge of the desert when the drugs began to take hold."
The book introduced the phrase fear and loathing to the
American lexicon, and put Thompson (and Rolling Stone)
on the map. Most importantly, it introduced readers to Thompson's
invention: the unique blend of biting social commentary and first-person
reporting that would come to be known as "Gonzo journalism."
Laced with liberal doses of drugs, drink, and violence (real
or imagined) Thompson's Gonzo reporting not only places the reporter
on the scene, it makes him the center of the action. Here is Thompson's
description, as quoted in a 1991 biography by William McKeen:
My idea was to buy a fat notebook and record the whole thing
as it happened, then send in the notebook for publication--without
editing. That way, I felt the eye and mind of the journalist would
be functioning as a camera. The writing would be selective and
necessarily interpretive--but once the image was written, the
words would be final; in the same way that a Cartier-Bresson photograph
is always (he says) the full-frame negative. No alterations in
the darkroom, no cutting or cropping, no spotting...no editing...True
Gonzo reporting needs the talents of a master journalist, the
eye of an artist/ photographer and the heavy balls of an actor.
Because the writer must be a participant in the scene, while he's
writing it....
This technique separated Thompson from other so-called New Journalists
like Tom Wolfe, who were content to observe events from the sidelines.
Wolfe's writing was also much tamer than Thompson's. For proof,
compare Wolfe's The Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test with Thompson's
Hell's Angels. Their descriptions of the Hell's Angels-Merry
Pranksters bash, particularly the Mountain Girl gangbang, couldn't
be more different in style and content. (Thompson, by the way,
introduced the Angels to Ken Kesey's Pranksters; he predicted
the bikers would stomp the hippies once the acid took hold. Alas,
only good vibes ensued.)
Critics of Thompson's work complain about his use of exaggeration
as a journalistic tool, and bemoan Gonzo journalism's blurring
of the distinction between fact and fiction. (Someone once said
Thompson never lets the facts get in the way of a good story.)
But if Thompson does indeed make stuff up (I believe he does),
so what? Readers should simply keep that in mind when reading
his work. Deliberate exaggeration is at the heart of Thompson's
style. If much of what he writes is bullshit, that doesn't make
it any less true.
Thompson's critics are also disturbed by his lack of objectivity.
But in Gonzo journalism, there is no pretense of objectivity.
Thompson's journalism is heavily influenced by the brilliant work
of that master of American letters H.L. Mencken, whose biting
social commentary was rarely objective. In Better than Sex
(1994), Thompson acknowledges Mencken's influence and spanks the
critics who complain about his lack of objectivity. Commenting
on Mencken's scathing obituary of William Jennings Bryan, Thompson
writes: It was clearly opinion--but I believed it then and
I believe it now...Mencken understood that politics--as used in
journalism--was the art of controlling his environment, and he
made no apologies for it. In my case...I've used reporting as
a weapon to affect political situations that bear down on my environment.
Thompson owes much to Mencken, whose social commentary, bitter
sarcasm, use of insults and epithets, iconoclasm, and philosophical
underpinnings (libertarian) are all present in Thompson's writing.
He's no Mencken clone, however. The master's use of vocabulary,
for example, is much more elegantly nuanced than Thompson's--Mencken's
mountebank and buncombe have (d)evolved into Thompson's
punk and bullshit, but mostly that's a sign of the
times. And unlike Thompson, no one who mattered ever accused Mencken
of making stuff up to make a point. Nevertheless, his influence
on Thompson is undeniable; and that influence makes Thompson the
link between Mencken and other author-journalists like P.J. O'Rourke
(Thompson's successor at Rolling Stone), Alexander Cockburn,
Christopher Hitchens, Charles Bowden and Edward Abbey, who described
himself as "a Hunter S. Thompson freak." (Thompson's
influence on friends Jim Harrison, Russell Chatham, and Jimmy
Buffett seems restricted to matters of lifestyle.)
After the success of Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas, Thompson
wrote Fear and Loathing: On the Campaign Trail '72, which
contains some of the best campaign coverage and commentary ever
written, and details what is perhaps Thompson's most notorious
piece of participatory journalism: After reporting that candidate
Ed Muskie was addicted to Ibogaine (an obscure substance), Muskie's
campaign was derailed. In 1979, a collection of Thompson's short
pieces was released as The Great Shark Hunt: Gonzo Papers Volume
1, followed by The Curse of Lono (a sort of Fear and
Loathing in Hawaii), and three more volumes of Gonzo Papers: Generation
of Swine, Songs of the Doomed, and Better than Sex.
The first volume of Thompson's letters, The Proud Highway,
was released in 1997.
NOW, ALMOST FOUR decades after its conception, comes The
Rum Diary, Thompson's first published novel. References to
The Rum Diary appear throughout The Proud Highway's
letters, where Thompson talks about his desire to write The Great
American Novel. At one point in Highway, after numerous
revisions and rejections of the novel, he confides that he has
found an outlet for his frustrated ambitions as a novelist--a
new kind of creative journalism. I found that revelation fascinating,
since it marks the birth of Gonzo journalism. Now, after reading
The Rum Diary, I recall that same revelation with a sigh
of relief, since it's evident Thompson didn't stand a chance as
a novelist.
Parts of The Rum Diary (now subtitled "The Long Lost
Novel") first appeared in Thompson's 1990 collection, Songs
of the Doomed, and more recently appeared in The New Yorker.
Set in the late 1950s, The Rum Diary tells the story of
Paul Kemp, a young journalist who takes a job on the San Juan
Daily News, Puerto Rico's English-language newspaper. It's
a struggling paper, always on the verge of bankruptcy. Its staff
is a gang of misfits and losers, drifters and drunks, has-beens
and beginners. Paul Kemp--who first appeared in "Prince Jellyfish,"
a short piece of fiction also presented in Songs of the Doomed--is
Thompson, of course, and it's interesting to see the Gonzo paradigm
upended: In Thompson's journalism, he incorporates fiction; in
The Rum Diary, much of the action is undoubtedly true.
The book recounts Kemp's adventures and misadventures with his
colleagues and bosses; and like many other Thompson stories, it
includes a character that serves as Thompson-Kemp's alter ego.
The most notable example of this device is found in Fear and
Loathing in Las Vegas' Dr. Gonzo, a character based on Thompson's
friend, Oscar Acosta. In The Rum Diary, the alter ego is
personified by a character named Yeamon, a wild, violent drunk
who loses his job, and then his girl, to the depravities of Thompson's
grimy Caribbean.
Throughout the 1960s, The Rum Diary went through numerous
revisions and was rejected by every publisher Thompson sent it
to. It's not hard to see why. It reads like a first novel...and
a sloppy, unfocused one at that. It contains laughable inanities:
It was almost May. I knew that New York was getting warm now,
that London was wet, that Rome was hot--and I was on Vieques,
where it was always hot and where New York and London and Rome
were just names on a map...And unnecessary elaborations: Most
of these people appeared to be expatriates--not tourists, but
the type who looked like they might live here on the island, or
at least somewhere in the Caribbean.... It also succumbs to
obvious literary devices clumsily employed, such as appearances
of Conrad's Heart of Darkness and The Nigger of the
Narcissus in the hands of characters on the verge of conflict.
Thompson has been criticized for avoiding sex in his writings,
but The Rum Diary will leave those critics counting their
blessings, since the book contains some of the most unerotic love
scenes I've ever read. And if Thompson's "gimmick,"
the "interracial orgy," raised any eyebrows in 1959,
it's downright tame (or just lame) by contemporary standards.
There are other concerns: The book contains at least one reference
to a real-life event that never happened, and the fact that 20
of the book's 21 chapters are almost exactly the same length reeks
of formula. There are also grounds to argue the story is several
chapters too long.
Before the good Dr. Thompson comes after me with his dogs and
his Samoan war club, let me hasten to add that there are things
to like about The Rum Diary as well. Thompson's depiction
of the carnival madness in St. Thomas is masterful, and the suspense
level rises nicely as the story heads toward its climax. It's
also nice to see that almost 40 years ago Thompson was already
beginning to sound like an unpolished version of his literary
old man, Mencken. Thompson's trademark use of biting commentary
and vicious insult was already in full swing, if not yet finely
tuned. Here his protagonist, Kemp, describes a fellow journalist:
Moberg was a degenerate...He was lewd and corrupt in every
way. He hated the taste of rum, yet he would finish a bottle in
ten minutes, then vomit and fall down. He ate nothing but sweet
rolls and spaghetti, which he would heave the moment he got drunk.
He spent all his money on whores and when that got dull he would
take on an occasional queer, just for the strangeness of it. He
would do anything for money, and this is the man we had on the
police beat. Often he disappeared for days at a time. Then someone
would have to track him down through the dirtiest bars in La Perla,
a slum so foul that on maps of San Juan it appears as a blank
space. La Perla was Moberg's headquarters; he felt at home there,
he said, and in the rest of the city--except for a few horrible
bars--he was a lost soul.
Some of Thompson's letters from The Proud Highway--letters
that eloquently convey the frustration and despondency he felt
while going through The Rum Diary's grueling cycle of revision
and rejection--make one tempted to go easy on the old sot. But
a few lines from Fear and Loathing will make the tender-hearted
reader snap back to his senses. Hunter Thompson wouldn't hesitate
to kick a man when he's down; he wouldn't hesitate to call a spade
a spade. So here's the bottom line on The Long Lost Novel: As
a specimen for study of the development of Thompson's style, and
as a companion piece to the fine Proud Highway, The
Rum Diary is worthwhile. As literature, it's worthless.
|
|