CLERK CLASH: The Clerk of the Superior Court is low-profile
office, but the job is an important one. The office employs 150-plus
people, maintains massive records and administers many of the
day-to-day responsibilities of a burgeoning court system. That
means the person in charge gets to spend tons of taxpayer money--quietly.
Three candidates are vying for the clerk's job this November 3--Republican
Patti Noland, Democrat Penny Bradford and Libertarian
Karen Caddell.
A former state senator, Noland has some definite ideas about
how to bring the office into this century--just as we're about
to enter the next one. Bradford is the status quo candidate of
both the retiring old-school incumbent, Jim Corbett, and
the political faction among the local judiciary led by Presiding
Judge Mike Brown.
Noland wants to take the clerk's employees out of the current
Judicial Merit System and give them real Civil Service protections.
She sponsored a bill in the Legislature authorizing the clerk
to do so. Bradford would continue the present patronage/serf pay-off
method that has allowed a pol like Corbett 20 years of hiring
his cronies.
Bradford hasn't been shy about collecting money from sitting
Superior Court judges; she's openly solicited them with a fund-raising
letter pushing the ethics envelope. Never mind that the judiciary
supposedly removed itself from "politics" some years
ago, when voters replaced the elective system with so-called "Merit
Selection." Bradford's campaign has clearly violated the
spirit of that unwritten agreement between voters and the judiciary.
Bradford has Republican Rod Cramer as her campaign guru.
Cramer, who once master-minded the successful elections of former
GOP county supervisors Paul Marsh and Ed Moore,
usually gets big bucks for these gigs, but his name is missing
from Bradford's expense records filed to date. That has some insiders
wondering if Cramer might not be in line for some of the pork
and contract largesse for which this rather quaint office has
been notorious under Corbett.
WRITE-IN, MOVE OUT: Malcolm Escalante, the carpetbagger
who serves as a Tohono O'odham judge as well as a member of the
Indian Oasis-Baboquivari School District Board, is planning on
seeking another school-board term, even though he still lives
in Tucson.
The Weekly revealed the peripatetic Escalante's violation
of residency law a few months back. Escalante and his cronies
on the Indian Oasis Board survived a recall attempt this summer.
Now he's running as a write-in candidate, challenging Elisapeta
Shanna Garcia and Harriet Toro for one of the two seats
to be decided next Tuesday.
Escalante, who was initially appointed to the Indian Oasis Board,
lives 65 miles away from Sells, which would seem to violate those
pesky residency requirements. Escalante's lame excuse is that
he lives in Tucson to attend college, a loophole that he claims
allows him to live outside his school district while serving on
its Board.
That's supposed to be only a temporary exception. But Escalante,
an apparent academic speed demon, has been attending Pima Community
College since--get this--1972! He's been working on a two-year
associate's degree to be a legal assistant for 26 years. He told
the Runner newspaper that he doesn't have a target completion
date.
County School Superintendent Anita Lohr, who appointed
Escalante, should stop the special treatment. She should pull
the plug on his term and end his election bid.
ENDORSEMENT ENVY: Legendary hypocrite Celestino Fernández
and the decent Carolyn Kemmeries received ill-advised endorsements
from the Chamber of Commerce in their campaigns for the TUSD Governing
Board. But since they both failed to win the endorsement of the
Tucson Citizen (which praised Rosalie Lopez and
Judy Burns), their camps have been cranking out the letters
to both the Citizen and The Arizona Daily Star.
Both Fernández and Kemmeries desperately want the Star's
blessing, which will come (at least officially) without participation
by Star Editorial Page Editor James Kiser. He told
candidates that he would not be part of the decision because his
wife, Shirley, works for TUSD. Wait--not only does she
work at the rotten school district, she coughed up $55 to Fernández's
campaign and $20 to Kemmeries, according to campaign-finance reports.
Meanwhile, Fernández criticized endorsements in general
at a forum for the TUSD candidates held last Thursday at Rincon
High.
"I'm not sure what endorsements mean, and particularly from
newspapers," said Fernández. "You look at endorsements
that newspapers throughout this country, including in Tucson,
candidates that are endorsed often lose and candidates that are
not endorsed often win. I hope that the voters, that every individual
voter will make her and his own decision about the candidates
and not rely upon some group or organization or newspaper that
has endorsed. What it means is that the Citizen made a
mistake."
The Chamber's endorsement was particularly misapplied. Did the
dummies down there realize neither Fernández nor Kemmeries
has any real private-sector experience?
|