A BRIEF ESSAY PROMPTED BY THE ARIZONA DAILY LYING SACK OF
SHIT: What is the proper role of "the press"
in our democratic society? This is a tired rhetorical question
journalism professors and other purveyors of academic bullpuckie
frequently put forth, and then proceed to answer in boring, unoriginal
discussions centering on the press' supposed responsibility to
enlighten and inform the public.
As defined by the over-paid academics and their masters in the
corporate-dominated establishment ruling this land, the press
is suppose to be the so-called unofficial Fourth Estate of our
government, right up there with the Executive, Legislative, and
Judicial branches.
Ignorant young Americans who take this argument seriously are
prone to calling themselves "journalists," and writing
bland stories focusing on the minutia of daily governance. In
doing so, they invariably ignore the serious cracks and fissures
afflicting our social and political systems. The daily newspaper
and broadcast overlords these young journalists serve would have
it no other way--as minor dynamos of the commerce-driven establishment,
the media captains know it's bad for business to rock the boat.
Thus, the unstated rule in every newsroom in which we've ever
worked has been: Sure, it's OK to give the appearance of rocking
the boat--the public eats it up, even as they pretend to despise
the media. But for christsakes, kid, don't do anything that might
reduce the obscene catch of an advertising dollars we're netting
here!
As a result, pursuit of the Truth, an elusive top quark even
in the best of times, is pretty much left to what the establishment
gurus have labeled as the wacko, the outsider and the radical.
Indeed, time and again throughout the rise and spread of Western
Civilization, it has been left to these lonely figures to alter
the potentially disastrous course of our collective history.
Happily, America's Founding Fathers were well aware of the elusive
quality of Truth and the difficulties inherent in comprehending
it while viewing life through the distorting lenses of politics
and culture.
Their solution, of course, was the First Amendment.
In just six words--"Congress shall make no law abridging..."--they
gave every American, not just the bigwigs and the self-appointed
establishment priesthood, a genuine shot at Truth with a capital
T. What those words mean should be plain to everyone: The government
is not going to tell you what to think or say. That's up to each
and every one of you.
In the case of press freedom, however, the people have spoken,
and not brilliantly, we're sorry to say. Today's newspaper and
broadcast journalism, especially on the local level, is a darkly
bubbling mishmash of minutia and corporate self-interest, a sort
of intellectual gruel designed to fill our bellies, as it were,
while not actually nourishing the body politick, and which may
severely harm our collective health in the long run.
Which brings us--at last!--to The Arizona Daily Star.
We spotted a newt's eye in last Thursday's serving of cold, gray
gruel.
On page A2 the editors saw fit to run a cutsey story by L.
Anne Newell purporting that Tucson police caught an
alleged grocery-store robber because the guy was dumb enough to
use a distinctive light-blue Ford Pinto as his getaway car. What
a dope, and his car is a piece of crap, too--ha, ha.
But the true dope, or rather dupe, here is the reader. The Star
failed to report the real reason the cops caught this clown so
quickly: A grocery store employee dropped an electronic tracking
device into the bad guy's money bag.
Of course the cops will be outraged that we've spilled the beans.
Merchants will complain we've blown the cover on a useful crime-fighting
tool. More robbers will say, "You can keep the bag, thanks,"
and make more clean getaways as a result.
Sorry, but Truth can be a real bitch.
And if you want your daily newspaper and your police department
to hide such minor facts from you for the sake of the "general
good," then there are a few questions you might want to ask
yourself. Like:
Who's currently defining the "general good"
here?
What else are they not telling me?
Where's this damn boat really headed, anyway?
Then again, maybe you'd rather not ask those questions. Maybe
you'd rather just go back to sleep and let the boat float on.
Hey, it's your God-given right as an American--we're not going
stop you. We're not even going to say tisk-tisk.
But, please, don't come whining to us when the boat flips over
and you're sucking in that awful Central Arizona Project water
again. City officials and the daily media, especially the Star,
have been telling you it'll be fine this time around. Just fine.
Everything is just fine. Growth limits? We don't need them.
And besides, we couldn't stop growth even if we wanted to. There'll
always be plenty of room--and water--to grow here. Yeah, just
keep the cash coming, please--you folks can hold the damn bag...We
really don't want to hurt anybody...It's all for the general good,
you know...
CAUSE AND EFFECT ANYONE? Cover story by Tim Vanderpool,
Tucson Weekly, July 23 1998: "COPS FOR RENT:
TPD Muscle Will Handle Your Private Tussle--Anytime, Day or Night."
Page One Metro section story, Tucson Citizen, August
3 1998:
"Off-duty cops face changes: The city may regulate how police
are paid for outside jobs."
Vanderpool's story indicated that some changes were coming in
the way TPD handles off-duty cop work. We suggest that TPD spend
a little time with the Pima County Sheriff's Department, which
has a reasonable policy about outside employment.
And it's nice to know that the two dailies--the Star
got around to covering the changes, too--finally got a press release
from TPD so they could write about this issue.
AND SPEAKING OF CITIZEN HEADLINES: Wednesday, August
5, Page One: "County oks property tax hike."
Sitting immediately below the head and above the fold was a picture
of Pima County Supervisor Sharon Bronson and a quote from
her. The quote was attributed to "Democratic COUNCILWOMAN
Sharon Bronson".
To the bean-counters at Gannett who run this pathetic rag and
the publisher they send in whose prime purpose appears to involve
squeezing out a few more bucks and further reducing staff:
Spend some of the twenty million-plus bucks you pumped out of
this town last year on a couple of copy readers, will ya? When
you screw up on Page One this big, you look stupid. Or maybe send
one of those dorks on your desk to Pima College to take a government
course so they'll know the difference between the County Board
of Supervisors and some unidentified city council. And tell those
east coast consultants that the real reason your penetration continues
to decline is that you produce a shabby product that fewer and
fewer people care to read.
'BOUT TIME, KIDDIES: A group of Amphitheater School
District parents has proposed an alternative site for a new
high school. The now-infamous decision to build a new school at
Shannon and Naranja roads has caused multiple delays over the
possible presence of the endangered pygmy owl. It's also cost
Amphi taxpayers a couple of million extra bucks in legal and other
fees to defend their ill-conceived decision.
Two years after the Tucson Weekly pointed out what a really
bad idea the site was--and why--we now see the two dailies getting
off their asses and not only reporting on the subject, but actually
editorializing about what we told you--and them--in 1996.
Gee, gang, better late than never.
WARD-ONLY VOTING? KISS ELECTION REFORM GOOD-BYE: The ill-considered
attempt to give Tucsonans better representation by electing City
Council members by ward will probably kill the current method
of funding those elections.
The current formula for city matching funds is based on the total
number of voters present in the citywide constituency. Ward elections
will divide the amount of money by six, meaning that the total
matching funds available for a Council race, both primary and
general, will be a paltry $6,000--assuming every candidate will
go along with limiting spending to $12,000 for both primary and
general elections. Currently a candidate can spend $72,000 citywide
in both elections, and the smart Democratic candidates drop most
of that in their primaries. There are virtually no real Republican
primaries for City Council these days.
Special-interest candidates will not take part in the new set-up,
and why should they--any of them can raise a helluva lot more
than twelve grand. Remember, the funding system is voluntary.
In fact, any real candidate can do much better than that
and will need to, because the basic costs of a real campaign,
even within a city ward, are much higher.
DESPERATELY SEEKING RETENTION: Superior Court Judge Robert
Donfeld was a good guy when he served his long stint at Justice
Court. He toiled long and hard as a Justice of the Peace, putting
up with rookie lawyers, confused citizens and wacky constables,
namely ex-constables F. Lee Archer and Ron DeSchalit.
So it was fitting that Donfeld finally got what he longed for--elevation
to the Superior Court, even if the deed was done by Gov. J.
Feloneous Whiteguy III, a convicted con artist.
Arrogance consumed Donfeld, however. And not the kind that whiny
lawyers complain about. Donfeld doesn't recognize former friends.
He can't be bothered to stop and say hello to the people who once
supported him.
Now he's in trouble. He is the only Pima County judge to earn
a recommendation of nonrenewal from the state Judicial Performance
Review Board. Donfeld's tenure comes up for voter approval November
3.
Donfeld and his new supporters, courthouse bureaucrats like Sue
Wachter, who defended him in a letter in a recent Sunday fishwrap,
say that it's just a few lawyers unfairly criticizing Donfeld
because he holds their feet to the fire, particularly while running
the court's "rocket docket.''
Certainly Donfeld, and all judges, should hold lawyers accountable.
They should enforce deadlines. They should not tolerate sloppy
work. But Donfeld's failure doesn't arise from crybaby lawyers.
It's his arrogance, and, frankly, his sour temperament.
The Skinny's Phoenix sources say that Donfeld couldn't subdue
his arrogance during the lousy performance he gave before the
Judicial Review Commission last month. He also was quick to blame
everybody and everything for his own crummy job. He blamed the
rocket docket and the assignment from Presiding Judge Michael
Brown to the special settlement court division.
Time to take a whiff of your own briefs, Judge Donfeld.
|