Consolidation of City And County Governments Won't Save Any Money.
By Emil Franzi
WITH PIMA COUNTY Parks Director Dan Felix's appointment
as director of the City of Tucson Parks Department, County Supervisor
Mike Boyd is calling for a merger of the two departments to "save
money through economy of scale."
Sounds like a nice idea. Unfortunately, Boyd, like most metro
government advocates, is blowing smoke, perpetuating myth and
exhibiting his basic ignorance about how government really works.
There's little if any savings to be found in consolidating the
city and county parks departments
Combining the two systems would obviously not reduce the need
for employees who work in those parks, nor for the equipment and
supplies they require. There would be no savings in purchasing,
since both organizations get stuff at about the same price now,
and there are few additional price breaks available.
The only possible savings would be in the reduction of administrative
personnel, which--superficially--seems plausible. But, upon closer
observation, it isn't: combining the two organizations would mean
there would be only one director and a few other high-ranking
brass. Unfortunately, that reduction in staff would quickly be
offset by the higher salaries paid everyone from the director
on down for being in charge of a larger organization. That's how
government works; that's how bureaucrats are compensated: the
larger the bureaucracy, the higher the administrative salaries.
Proponents of governmental consolidation generally ignore this
fact.
Furthermore, consolidation in government never cuts people, it
just rearranges them, often with a raise. Proponents need to be
challenged on that basic fact of bureaucratic life and asked the
simple questions: How will this save money? Who will no longer
be on the payroll?
There are a few functions in which consolidation savings are
possible. A classic example is data handling. Combining the City
of Tucson and Pima County's Management Information Services departments
would mean major savings, because the need for expensive duplicate
hardware and software would be reduced.
This was determined a few years back when both jurisdictions
actually discussed a merger. The net result was panic on the part
of the City of Tucson, whose pols and bureaucrats immediately
built a new palace to house their MIS services, complete with
a whole bunch of new hardware.
Information is power, and the city's bureaucracy was not about
to share any of it with Pima County. The thought of letting anybody
into their records besides their own mandarins was sufficient
for them to kill the one real attempt at a sensible consolidation.
Most other areas show very little promise of savings. County
Supervisor Ray Carroll believes big bucks are waiting in a consolidation
of purchasing services. Carroll, having considerably less time
in the game than Boyd, is easier to forgive for buying into this
portion of the myth. The truth is, combining forces won't help
much, since both governments have already reached economies of
scale beyond which little advantage will accrue. Again, merging
the two departments would only increase the salaries of those
who wind up on top of the big consolidation.
The biggest myth is that there are mammoth savings just waiting
for taxpayers by combining city and county governments completely.
But stop a minute and look at what those governments do, and
you'll see there is no "duplication" when it comes to
roughly 75 percent of the services rendered. County government
runs healthcare programs and hospitals, assesses property taxes
and administers the jail. City government runs local libraries
and a number of other programs in which the county has no say.
Both have a police force, parks and a court system, and both have
similar administrative functions. Combining them would save little
or nothing.
How many cops, dispatchers, clerks and fingerprint techs would
you no longer need if you had one police force? Because the new,
unified force would be much larger, current top officers present
in the sheriff's force would have to be made at least colonels.
Not a lot of savings there.
Dreamers like Boyd who prattle vaguely about the alleged savings
available in consolidation simply expect the rest of us to accept
the concept on blind faith. Unfortunately we have too much government
built on blind faith already.
|