|
'The Avengers' Illuminates The Pomo Zeitgeist With A Cathode Glow.
By James DiGiovanna
The Avengers, by Toby Miller (BFI Publishing). Paper, $19.95.
TOBY MILLER'S deceptive study of The Avengers is
one of the best and clearest books on the confluence of post-modern
academic theorizing and popular culture.
Ostensibly about the sexy-mod British television series of the
1960s, The Avengers is really a primer in all things pomo,
a look at the way contemporary culture theory can use something
as mundane as a show about a woman in a leather catsuit to illuminate
a moment in the modern zeitgeist.
For fans of the series, there is indeed a history of its production,
stories of the ups-and-downs of filming a British show for an
increasingly global audience, and inside information on the vagaries
of casting that led from one sidekick to another for the quaintly
upper-crust John Steed. However, Miller, who teaches film at NYU
(where they still prefer to call it "cinema"), is well
armed with a knowledge of French post-structuralism and American
media studies. He never succumbs to the temptations of jargon,
though, so this book could fool the fans of sci-fi and super-thrillers
into believing they're just getting the straight dope on why Emma
Peel dressed so cool, and what was up with all those hot cars.
For example, a chapter entitled "Genre" begins with
the Latin roots of the term, follows the history of genre literature,
notes where its boundaries blur with potentially canonical literature,
examines the interplay of such genres as science-fiction, spy
thrillers, horror, and soap operas, and picks out salient genre
themes and modes without ever traveling more than a few paragraphs
from the adventures of Steed and Peel.
A chapter on pop draws from Susan Sontag's famous 1958 essay,
and Ayn Rand's defense of romanticism, to show how pop became
a high-art concept. Tracing the adoption of romantic themes into
mass culture commodities, Miller points out that The Avengers
television series contained all of these basic notions, plus an
ironic wit that made them more palatable to the less conservative
viewers. Identifying pop with this confluence of romanticism,
irony, and certain key characteristics: "transient, expendable,
low in cost, young, witty, sexy, gimmicky, glamorous and big-business
like," Miller sets forth a novel and powerful definition
by grounding his analysis in the realities and fantasies of a
specific television production.
The chapter entitled "The Post-Modern," though not
terribly original, does a smashing job of summing up this amorphous
and slippery concept. While this section would make a fine addition
to an academic reading list, or perhaps serve as the primary text
for a course on postmodernism, it's also delightfully fun to read,
riven with references to television and popular music while commenting
on what passes for culture in the aeries of art.
Somehow, Miller manages to catalogue and connect all the things
that have passed for pomo in recent years--from identity politics
to melange, from the discourse of deconstruction (amply de-jargonized
and explained) to the capitalism of world markets, from the decline
of the unifying narratives of religion and ideology to the rise
of the service based industries--and shows how each informs the
other and finds a template in his favorite television series.
This is no mean feat, especially if one wants to avoid sounding
facile or reading too much in, and Miller is aware of these difficulties
and manages to avoid them. One could quickly be convinced by this
volume that The Avengers was the perfect mirror of the
anti-modern mood of the '60s, and insofar as it underwent so many
changes in form and cast, perhaps it was. By changing itself so
often, the series was able to present more than one identity and
explore a variety of styles, often at disparate extremes. Thus,
it does serve well for the kind of analysis Miller is after here.
Nonetheless, he knows when to depart from his beloved, and when
it serves as mere counterpoint to the ideas he wishes to address.
The oddity is that he is able to do all this without becoming
boring or pedantic, so that he produces a satisfying book for
the fan while never betraying his academic rigor.
|
|