A New Volume Of 'Best American Poetry' Celebrates Both The Significant And The Schadenfreude.
By James DiGiovanna
Best American Poetry 1997, edited by James Tate;
series editor David Lehman (Scribner). Paper, $13.
EACH YEAR, BEST American Poetry is edited
by a different American poet, in keeping with the title, one supposes.
This year, perhaps in an effort to keep the requisite James Tate
poem out of the volume, Tate himself has been chosen to oversee
the selection.
As one might expect from Tate, the poems in this year's edition
are rich in inventive language, but surprisingly Tate is not adverse
to including several fairly straightforward, emotional poems,
including the first piece in the book, by Ai. Written in the voice
of a returning Viet Nam vet, this narrative poem provides an eerie
opening to the volume, and is followed by another evocative and
naturalistic poem, Sherman Alexie's "The Exaggeration Of
Despair." Alexie's piece is as far from Tate's style as poetry
gets, eschewing poetic figures in all but its opening and closing
lines, which frame a series of two-line descriptions of the specific
humiliations and degradations suffered by Alexie's Native American
friends and acquaintances.
One expects to find such usual suspects as Alexie, Ai, Ammons
and Ashberry in all of these volumes, and there are plenty of
poetry mainstays here, including some very strong work by Nobel
Laureate Derek Walcott, and a piece by Pulitzer-winner Charles
Simic which seems to have been included largely because Simic
and Tate are pals.
While those looking for work by the likes of Donald Hall, Robert
Creeley and Charles Wright won't be disappointed, the fun of volumes
like this is in finding new voices. Tate has done a good job here,
even if there was a bit of nepotism at work, as two of the lesser-known
poets are currently students of Tate.
The strongest new entry is from Jennifer L. Knox, who lists work
as a "road crew flag girl" in lieu of the prizes and
publications that she does not yet have. Her poem, "Bright
Lights of Responsibility," has a sense of humor and use of
figures reminiscent of the best of Tate's own work, but with a
much clearer narrative and more direct message. It's the tale
of two friends, one suggesting irresponsible fun, the other playing
the moral party pooper:
..."Let's go down to the river.
Bosses from all over the state are having sex with their young
secretaries
in a wild group fucking kind of office thing with prosthetics
and electricity.
They're misusing whipped cream can chargers and animal sedatives.
The press is invited and nobody's going to get in trouble"
I told her, "No I won't go. It's not right .
Even if these big fat men get interviewed on Entertainment
Tonight...."
The use of rhyme here is part of the much-discussed "return
of rhyme" in contemporary poetry. Tate showcases this trend,
and not only with poems that make sparing use of the occasional
end rhyme. Joseph Brodsky's "Love Song" is entirely
in rhyme and meter, and manages to be successfully modern in spite
of these restrictions:
If you were a bird, I'd cut a record
and listen all night long to your high-pitched trill.
If I were a sergeant, you'd be my recruit,
and boy I can assure you you'd love the drill.
Perhaps the most amusing part of these volumes is not seeing
the old-timers, tracing the trends, or looking for new voices,
but the schadenfreude of figuring out who was excluded. Last year's
Adrienne Rich-edited volume was one of the few not to include
a poem by Tate; Tate returns the favor by omitting Rich's oeuvre
from this year's selections. Stephen Dobyns is out this year while
he undergoes sensitivity training for assaulting an undergraduate;
and Thomas Lux is somewhat mysteriously excluded, as his recent
collection was extremely well-received. Harry Mathews, who was
a mainstay in these Best of's for their first five years
(the series started in 1988 with an excellent selection edited
by John Ashberry), seems to have gone on "permanent hiatus";
but James Dickey, in spite of being dead, manages to get one last
poem in.
While there are always some oddities and misses in a book such
as this, Tate's flavor is well represented, even if he is a bit
too enamored of humorous poems. This is one of the better collections
in the series, a welcome surprise after last year's lackluster
edition. It's certainly kind of the editors to wade through the
knee-high mound of mediocrity that winds up in poetry journals
and pluck out the gems, producing a real rarity: an entire book
of poems that don't suck.
|