In Praise Of Dr. Death.
By Jeff Smith
THE DAY BEFORE my mom died, she and Dave and I had a heart-to-heart-to-heart
talk about what would be the most expeditious way to kill her
without any of us landing in the slammer. As you might imagine,
it was a hard conversation to have.
But not for the reasons you might suppose.
Sure, I loved my mother and so did my brother, and she loved
life, and we're all sentimental and all that, but we'd seen this
coming a long way off and had come to terms with it. No, the reason
we were having such a tough time with the final arrangements,
now that it was time to make them, was that Mom had a stroke the
morning of her penultimate day and she couldn't talk.
So Dave and I sat there trying to figure out everything we ought
to be asking her--and anticipating what she might want to be asking
us--and getting her to blink once for yes and twice for no. This
is a pain in the ass.
Pauline Smith began veering to the left in 1985, three years
before she died. Literally. She noticed it one night shortly before
Christmas when we went for a stroll through Winterhaven to see
the lights. A couple weeks later the doctor told her she had Lou
Gehrig's disease and would be dead within two years and crippled
and helpless well before that.
She took it like a trooper, toughed it out for two years, then
another, and we all had time to contemplate what it would mean
for her to gradually lose control of her body, while her mind
remained mercilessly aware of how horseshit her world was turning.
We discussed the Hemlock Society and medical suicide. We talked
to her doctor, who told us how hospitals could unofficially assist
the terminally ill in making as painless and stressless an exit
as possible.
Then it comes down to the last scene of the last act and mom
goes mum on us. Terrific. We call the hospital and ask for the
doc who's been in on the joke and he's away on vacation, out of
the country. Swell. But a couple hours later Mom gets her voice
back and we can get some decisions made in earnest.
She does not want to die at home in her own bed. Some perverse
streak of Yankee Puritan pride will not let her rest, knowing
that her two boys are going to have to deal with her mortal remains.
Essentially she wants the dirty work subbed out to the contractors
who make their living in dying. All we can really tell her--and
tell her to tell any doctor, nurse, candy-striper or med-student
in scrubs who might happen to ask--is never to turn down a hit
of morphine, and always speak, nod or bat her eyelashes in the
affirmative if they want to know is she in pain. The narcotic,
we have been taught by our studies of assisted suicide, will ease
pain, relieve anxiety and, most importantly, suppress respiration.
Short of lethal injection, it's the shortest, easiest route out
of here.
Mom understands. She's ready. The wetness welling up under her
eyes is from having to say goodbye and mean it, to everything
that's familiar and fond to her.
I've thought about that day, and the one that followed, often
these past 10 years. I dream about my mother, and Dad, who died
another decade before Mom left. And I thank everything and nothing
in particular that I was still on my hind legs the day my father
died, and was able to carry him in my arms into the hospital,
where he let go of the tail of the tiger that kept doubling back
and biting him, and that I was with Mom too, when she left.
And I count myself lucky, because I didn't have to spend days,
weeks, months and more trying to find a place to park at TMC or
UMC, and watch them suffer the slow inevitability to death, American-style.
Which is why I have no sympathy with people like the editorial
writer at The Arizona Daily Star who wrote the recent screed
on Jack Kevorkian, and could not impart any discernible opinion
on whether Dr. Death is a murderer, a grand-standing egomaniac
on an accidental mission of mercy, or God's own agent of common
sense.
If you ask me, anything Kevorkian can do to get the American
public--and ultimately the American medical establishment and
our nation's lawmakers--to recognize the need and humane purpose
in assisting the terminally ill in ending their lives of suffering,
is justified.
Even if it does look suspiciously like a ratings magnet for CBS
Television during the November sweeps period.
Okay, so the good doctor went way beyond guiding the hand of
the dying this time. This time he shoved the plunger home. This
time he pumped a dying man full of enough lethal drug to kill
him. This time he committed what technically might be murder.
Hey: The guy was going to die anyway. Sooner instead of later.
Later would only mean he suffered more and longer. And we're all
going to die ultimately anyway. Is it wrong, therefore, for one--admittedly
non-PC and untelegenic--zealot to keep hectoring the national
conscience, daring the legal and medical establishments, until
finally we confront and come to terms with the unlovely truth?
I don't think so.
Jack Kevorkian has been helping the sick and dying for years
now, trying to force legal issues to the conclusion, and still
we have not resolved the question of whether it is legal for a
dying person to end his own life, and to obtain the help he may
require in exercising this right. I know it is right to do so:
we just haven't stated for the record that we as a society under
law will sanction it.
And until we do, Jack Kevorkian has made it clear that he will
keep jobbing his thumb in our eye. If we don't like it--and evidently
we don't--then our remedy is clear:
Recognize and legislate the right of each of us to do with our
own life, and death, what we choose.
|