![]() |
![]() |
![]() 'Last Man Standing' Swims With Violence. By Stacey Richter I GUESS MAYBE you'll have to kill me," the thug says to the tough guy. "It'll hurt if I do," the tough guy replies. Then there's a bang, bang, bang, etc. The thug falls down and the tough guy watches. Thus the violence begins in earnest in Last Man Standing, Walter Hill's homage to Akira Kurosawa's 1961 Yojimbo, which was itself influenced by Hollywood westerns of the day and based on Dashiel Hammet's Red Harvest. (Sergio Leone also did a version in 1964, A Fistful of Dollars.) Bruce Willis swaggers and sweats as John Smith, a 1930s version of Kurosawa's wandering Samurai, and a not-very-veiled reference to Leone's Man With No Name. With no objective other than to be tough, he rides into the dusty little town of Jericho (it inexplicably looks like the set of Gunsmoke) and gets himself into some hard-boiled trouble.
I'm really not sure if Hill intended for Last Man Standing to be a comedy, but it's hilarious. It has something in common with those forgotten '70s movies on TV on Sunday afternoons, where all the good guys have wide lapels and all the kids complain about being hassled by the pigs--it's a perfectly serious movie, but it's so stylized and absurd that it's funny at the same time. Everything about this movie is over-the-top, from the tough-guy dialogue to the stereotyped characters. The Irish gang sits around a table, eating from a big dish of potatoes. The Italian gang sits around an even bigger table, eating from a big dish of spaghetti. One of the female characters has been won in a card game. And John Smith shoots 'em all up, no matter what. (Well, not the ladies. He has a soft spot for the skirts.)
In tone, Last Man Standing recalls Roman Polanski's layered, melodramatic Bitter Moon, especially in the stylized narration. But Polanski most certainly meant for Bitter Moon to be funny (at least in parts), while it's unclear if Hill intended for Last Man Standing to have comedic elements, or if he's simply seen so many movies and lived so ensconced in the Hollywood tradition that he's come to believe movie clichés are somehow meaningful rather than ridiculous. Even the relentless violence in this movie has a double character. It's Peckinpah-style violence, but Peckinpah as filtered through the cartoon-like lens of Hong Kong action movies via Quentin Tarantino. Thus, we have the now obligatory scene of two men training guns at each other at once, shooting with crossed arms; scenes of one man killing five men, 10 men, you name it--John Smith can kill it, and he won't really care. Maybe it's simply this "whatever" attitude that prevents this movie from being compelling on its own terms. None of the characters are particularly likable, or realistic, so who cares if they're turned into human sieves with machine guns? No one's ever particularly disturbed to see a cartoon character go. Very little of the violence in Last Man Standing even seems real. It's just big fish eating little fish, sweetheart.
Last Man Standing is playing at Catalina
(881-0616), De Anza Drive-In (745-2240),
El Dorado (745-6241) and Foothills (742-6174)
cinemas.
|
![]() |
Home | Currents | City Week | Music | Review | Cinema | Back Page | Forums | Search
![]() |
![]() |
© 1995-97 Tucson Weekly . Info Booth |
![]() |