|
Milan Kundera Leaves Behind Lush Political Allegory For The Stark Human Existence Of 'Identity.'
By Zachary Woodruff
MILAN KUNDERA'S books are rarely direct, clarifying themselves
as they unfold. The Unbearable Lightness of Being handled
its material at such oblique angles that, years after I'd first
read it, I picked it up again and began reading the last chapter.
From there, I read the entire book backwards, chapter by chapter,
and found it made just as much sense. (It didn't hurt that Kundera
had been jumping back and forth in time like a student filmmaker
with a Pulp Fiction obsession.)
A master craftsman, Kundera has no need for linearity. Nor has
he a need for focus: He can juggle European political history
in one hand and provocative sexual scenarios in the other, all
while his mouth is profoundly philosophizing. He's great enough
to get away with it.
Because of such sensational skills, some readers may be disappointed
that Kundera's latest book, Identity, approaches its subject
via much subtler means. The title comprises the theme precisely,
and the story unfolds in an almost entirely linear fashion. Kundera's
trademark politics, which reflected on his tenuous Czechoslovakian
citizenship during Communist rule, are almost completely absent
now that he's a naturalized Frenchman. And as for the sex, well...let's
just say that Identity will not make a playfully erotic
movie starring Juliet Binoche and Daniel Day-Lewis. (Though sex
does play a stark role in the concluding passages.)
What Identity does have, within its sketchy but elegant
168 pages, is concentrated thematic focus: The concept of identity
is neatly explored within an isolated and very organic relationship
between a Parisian couple named Chantal and Jean-Marc. Both of
them are nearing their middle ages, and it's forcing them to come
to terms with who they are. If this sounds like just another tale
of mid-life crisis, think again: Kundera deftly steers away from
the usual fear-of-death and second-childhood territory, where
characters must attempt to re-establish a sense of meaning and
security. He's more interested in how we manage to reconcile our
selves with humanity, and whether this is even possible.
Kundera does all of this while rarely bringing up the subject
directly. He gives us the world alternately through the eyes of
Chantal and Jean-Marc, volleying their perceptions of themselves
and each other within a few seemingly insignificant incidents
of daily life which become major points of departure.
Many stories about identity conclude that love is the power that
transforms us and takes us beyond ourselves. Kundera starts with
this as his premise, and it's an idea that doesn't solve anything,
but only opens the door to further issues. Identity begins
innocuously with a scene at the beach in which Chantal realizes
that "Men don't turn to look at me anymore." In fact,
the scrutinous presence of young men starts to vex and threaten
her. As her sexual being recedes, what becomes of the rest of
her?
At the same time, in searching for Chantal, Jean-Marc accidentally
approaches the wrong woman, leading him to question what makes
Chantal different from anyone else. This is distressing to Jean-Marc
because he's committed his whole life to this beloved individual
Chantal, at the expense of a career.
In trademark fashion, Jean-Marc's and Chantal's crises prove
paradoxical: Without a sense of self, they aren't sure if they
can love each other; and without each other's love, they're not
sure who they are.
But Kundera rarely states the paradox in such plain terms. He
forms impressions around the subject, turning its conundrums into
a mesmerizing dream. This leads to some lyrical, thematically
flowing passages, as when a friend reminds Jean-Marc how he once
complained that eyelids were like windshield wipers--a parallel
that historically kept him disturbingly aware of the body's imperfection,
while in the present leading into a humorous rumination about
the soul; and then Jean-Marc concludes, pessimistically, that
the negligible purpose of friendship is to hold up a mirror to
our past selves.
Or when Chantal's work friend describes the insignificance of
individuals as such:
The invention of the locomotive contains the seed of the airplane's
design, which leads ineluctably to the space rocket. That logic
is contained in the things themselves; in other words, it is part
of the divine project. You can turn in the whole human race for
a different one, and still the evolution that leads from the bicycle
to the rocket will be just the same. Man is only an operator,
not the author of that evolution. And a paltry operator at that,
since he doesn't know the meaning of what he's operating. That
meaning doesn't belong to us, it belongs to God alone, we're here
only to obey Him so that He can do what He wants.
If Kundera risks turning his characters into mere mouthpieces
for his ideas, he has at least given them enough plot to keep
their voices distinct. It's a plot which, in its simplicity, slices
right back into the theme: Chantal begins receiving anonymous
love letters, and she knocks herself out imagining the identity
of her would-be lover. Could it be that worldly man sipping wine
in the restaurant patio across the street? Or is it the sophisticated
but beaten-down panhandler resting under the tree? In a strange
way, both possibilities reflect upon potential life outcomes for
Jean-Marc. And, since nothing in a Kundera book is ever one-sided,
Jean-Marc's awareness of the love-note mystery reflects back upon
his perceptions of the various faces of Chantal. Does he even
know her at all?
As if to compensate for his characters' confusions, Kundera limits
himself to the simplest of prose. As a result, Identity
is a short, quick read. At the end, the conclusion seems disappointingly
abrupt, with so many thematic loose ends. But this is a story
that lingers even after the last page has been turned, leaving
the reader the pleasant process of tying those loose ends on his
own. I think for this latest effort, that may have been the author's
only goal: to turn those loose ends into tangible, perhaps even
questionable, starting points.
|
|