VISIONS OF PUBLIC ART: The climate for public art, particularly
downtown, has changed dramatically since the 1991 public outcry
over David Black's "Sonora," the Main Library's red
metal sculpture pavilion (or "modern art monstrosity,"
as some have called it) on Stone Avenue downtown. These days,
semi-permanent murals, "phantom gallery" window displays,
and even more colorful metal sculpture by Stephen G. Derks (in
front of the Bank of America building just across the street from
the controversial library commission) has made its way into our
city center with nary a sniff or a whine. Or has it?
Three local video artists, Patti Cassidy, KT Good and
Eleanor Kohloss, explore themes and attitudes about public
art in Tucson with Visions of Public Art: Documentary and
Experimental Video Works, a free screening and discussion
from 7 to 9 p.m. Friday, July 24, at the T/Pima Arts Council,
240 N. Stone Ave. For more information, call 624-0595.
T/PAC's Beth Hancock anticipates the program will be of
interest to local artists, as well as "people who've enjoyed
(public art) and want to know more about the artists. KT Good's
work focuses on murals, and also incorporates artist interviews."
Hancock says the program is also part critique, both of the work
and of the commission process--namely, the concessions artists
are often forced to make.
MAKING HEADLINES: What appeared to be some really good
news was splashed across the front page of Inside Tucson
Business last week (Tuesday, July 13, if you must know).
There in bold type at the bottom of the page we learned, "Puto
resigns as Eller School head." (For those who missed
out on the singular pleasure of extracurricular high-school Spanish
vocabulary, puto is a slightly more potent translation
for "son of a bitch."
It even had his picture, a smiling middle-aged guy with the simple
caption "Puto" italicized under his mug.
In the interest of full disclosure, we're obliged to point out
that this particular "Puto" refers to one Christopher
Puto, who by this account seems to be a good guy whose resignation
will be a great loss to the UA Eller Graduate School of Management's
administration. So we intend no disrespect to the man himself.
But his unfortunate last name got us thinking about a better
world, where the daily papers announced putos everywhere
resigning from the school boards...starting, say, with TUSD and
Amphi?
GIVING AT&T A BAD NAME? It seems long-distance phone
solicitation has gone guerrilla. In a phone scam alert
making its way around the Internet, individuals allegedly identifying
themselves as AT&T service technicians may request that you
hit the 90# keys to complete their test on your phone line.
The scam goes that by so doing, you give that individual access
to your long-distance service, allowing the caller to place long-distance
calls billed to your account. "We were further informed that
this scam has been originating from many of the local jails/prisons."
(Apparently jails are to Pittsburgh what colleges are to Boston--there's
one on every corner? Are we to infer that there are actually some
remaining Pennsylvania jails and prisons with good, honest inmates?)
A software engineer from Phoenix says he confirmed the access
code with one AT&T long-distance repair center, which said
the 90# code is available through just about any long-distance
service provider, not exclusively AT&T.
As long as it's going to go the route of urban myth, we'd like
to suggest the "90-pound brigade" is actually a loose
band of consumer vigilantes, fed up with early morning and dinner-hour
interruptions by automatons insisting that a quick change in carriers
will yield better rates. Tired of being victimized by a ringing
phone with blocked caller ID, they've taken long-distance service
into their own hands!
They go around calling 800-numbers saying things like, "You
want True Savings, AT&T? You can't handle True Savings!";
and "Hey MCI...who's part of your Friends and Family circle
now?" True terrorists, their demands are unclear
and their tactics indiscriminate. They cannot be stopped.
It may not be true, but you heard it here first.
|