When It Comes To Tucson's $398 Million Budget, The City Council Is Michael Brown's Doormat.
By Dave Devine
OTHER THAN A few arguments over funding for the Copper
Bowl and El Tour de Tucson, the city council earlier this week
rubber-stamped almost all of City Manager Michael Brown's recommended
spending plans for the next fiscal year.
While Brown apparently incorporated a few council suggestions
in the budget, it's overwhelmingly Brown's document. That, apparently,
is the way it should be in the view of most city council members.
The primary focus of what the council did discuss, as usual,
was funding for outside agencies. These are non-governmental groups
that rely on the city for part or all of their funding. The budgets
for almost all city departments, where the really big money is
spent, were simply accepted by the council, many without discussion.
On June 3, the council did look at some minor increases in spending
for libraries, solid waste education and urban planning. To pay
for these changes, the council is considering imposing a fee on
smalltime garbage haulers and raising fees for sign permits as
well as rezoning and variance requests.
After one month and four review sessions, the council ended up
altering only $800,000 out of a total $398-million general operating
budget. As usual, there were winners and losers in the process:
Winner: Michael Brown, City Manager. The all-Democratic
council's total acquiescence to Brown in budgetary matters was
clearly demonstrated at its May 20 meeting. Members were more
interested in discussing lame agenda items such as "tax treatment
of the sale and installation of window coverings" and "horses
in residential areas" than in talking about the city budget.
That meant they didn't even consider tens of millions of dollars
in proposed spending by the Parks and Recreation and Transportation
departments, among others.
To make it look like the council had at least a small role in
the process, Brown suggested council members send him questions
on these departmental budgets. Only council members Molly McKasson
and Steve Leal submitted questions.
Loser: City Employees. Brown's early estimates
for the next fiscal year included $9.3 million in pay raises.
But to balance the budget, he reduced this sum to $7.2 million.
It was anticipated the Tucson Police Officers Association would
fight to increase pay for officers above the recommended levels.
But the recent rash of criminal charges and resignations within
the department has apparently killed that threat for now.
Winner: City Council Members. Not only did
the voters approve a salary increase for council members last
year, but the council gave itself a bonus this year as well. The
size of each member's staff will increase, at a total cost to
taxpayers of nearly $200,000.
Loser: Poor Bus Riders. The City Manager drew the
line on more subsidies for mass transit, and a majority of the
council might be willing to go along. Brown has made it clear
he wants bus riders, not the city's general fund, to pay for the
loss of federal funding to the system as well as increased operating
expenses. Over the next five years, Sun Tran riders will be expected
to cover almost all of these costs.
The city staff has recently floated the idea of raising the 75-cent
bus fare to 85 cents in a few months and then to $1.20 next year.
They anticipate this will mean three million fewer people will
ride the bus each year, out of a present total of over 15 million
riders. Cleaner air through more driving, anyone?
A 60-percent fare increase is probably more than the council
will support. But the idea that riders, rather than the city's
general fund, should pay for Sun Tran seems to be gaining acceptance.
Winner: Landfill Issues. Earlier this year Brown
had estimated $4.2 million more would be needed in the next year
to meet landfill and solid waste needs. Tucson's old garbage requires
a lot of clean-up under state and federal regulations. But even
that $4.2 million figure was almost $2 million short of what Brown
said was needed to meet "crucial" landfill needs.
Taking funds from a variety of sources, including the proposed
employee pay raises, Brown was able to devote $2.5 million more
to this issue. Not enough to cover all of the legally mandated
needs, but at least it's a start. In coming years, the city will
have to pay many millions more to mitigate our landfill environmental
problems.
Loser: The Community. In his budget statement to
the city council, Brown wrote, "The people of Tucson are
becoming poorer." Of the vast array of programs the city
pays for to improve the local economy, he said, "The city
funds staff and non-profit agencies to go out and promote economic
development and thereby, theoretically, jobs by nurturing existing
businesses and recruiting new businesses into town. Whether this
really works is a serious question in light of the statistics."
Brown's solution to the growing poverty in Tucson was to suggest
a series of council study sessions on the issue. The council's
response so far has been to continue to fund bicycle races, spring-training
baseball and other such "essential" services in the
name of economic development.
The public will have a last opportunity to comment on Brown's
budget before the council finishes rubber-stamping it. This public
hearing will be on Monday evening, June 10, at City Hall. But
don't bother going, because you won't make any difference. Michael
Brown has made the decisions for you.
|