TOO MUCH INITIATIVE? Statewide, at least half a
dozen groups are circulating initiative petitions in hopes of
placing various issues on the November ballot. To make it onto
the ballot, the organizations each must gather a minimum of 112,000
valid signatures by July 2.
As in prior years, most groups floating these initiatives are
employing paid petition passers, because, thanks to arizona's
exploding population growth the number of signatures required
to place an issue on the ballot has become so large it's almost
impossible to do it with volunteers alone.
There's one problem this year: The for-profit firms that collect
signatures efficiently are having big trouble finding enough employees
willing to circulate petitions. The economy is apparently good
enough at the bottom that anybody who wants a scut job has already
found one, and passing petitions is hard labor.
The problem is further complicated by the sheer number of petition
drives. This year in the City of Tucson, for example, folks passing
petitions for water recharge and election-by-ward have added to
the local pile.
And a professional signature-gatherer can only carry so many
petitions, something candidates--who also must gather signatures
to make it on the ballot--had better realize. It's too late to
plan on paying people to do it for you, so you'd better find some
volunteers or go get your own signs.
What this ultimately will mean is that some ballot measures just
won't make it. Petition passers are all independent contractors
and will go with the highest bidders, because the labor shortage
has run up the price per signature for those willing to gather
them. So the cost of placing items on the ballot will be even
higher this year.
So much for the original concept that the initiative process
was a way for "the people" to place items on the ballot.
AND HERE'S HOW YOU CAN HELP: The Urban Growth Boundary
Initiative is the developers' worst nightmare. Considering
how cheap and greedy the bastards mostly are, anything that might
slow their continuing rape of our unique desert ecosystem scares
them.
This item would go like crap through a goose with Arizona voters--if
it gets on the ballot. The measure, which would actually put some
teeth into local government's ability to restrain sprawl and growth,
spooked the Growth Lobby so badly they got their legislative
stooges and Gov. Jane Dee Hull to shill for their loophole-laden
alternative, which will be on the November ballot as a referendum.
Proponents of the real proposal have set up a large volunteer
base and raised some money to get paid signatures. But time is
short, and these folks need all the help they can get.
So if you really believe in saving what's left of the Sonoran
Desert, do something about it by passing petitions. Those inclined
should call Citizens for Growth Management at 747-5078.
They're being led here by a super lady named Linda Tepper,
and she needs your help. Do it now!
BOYD FLIES THE COOP: We had some hope that Pima County
Supervisor Mike Boyd would mend his ways when he took over
as chairman of the Board and accept some of the responsibility
the job entails. But once again, he can't even meet our low standards
by performing the simple task of staying through a meeting.
Boyd grabbed a whole lot of ink and air time from the gullible
establishment press a couple of months ago when he announced it
was time to do something about the problems caused by urban sprawl.
What he really had in mind was appointing yet another pointless
committee to study growth issues, while the Legislature passed
measures to prevent counties from doing anything at all about
uncontrolled growth.
Fortunately for our community, other Board members, led by Supes
Sharon Bronson and Raul Grijalva, pushed beyond
Boyd's spineless puppet show and actually tried to accomplish
something.
They did that May 19--almost two months early. Boyd, who was
responsible for bringing up the subject in the first place, clearly
had plenty of notice that he had the responsibility to be there
on May 19 and chair the meeting. But he chose to bug out early.
We're told he had to go out of town for his other employer. What's
the matter, Mikey? Didja have one of those cheapo airline tickets
you didn't want to lose out on?
County supervisors are paid $52,000 a year, along with a car,
plenty of bennies and a pension package twice as good as ordinary
government employees, all for what's basically a part-time job.
All they have to do to avoid malfeasance, misfeasance, and non-feasance
is show up for the regular meetings. Boyd can't even do that.
AMPHI ANTICS: At the March meeting of the Amphi School
District Superintendent's Council (composed of district principals
and their PTO presidents) Superintendent Bob "Bubba"
Smith, with Board Member Richard Scott in attendance,
split the members into four groups to "discuss" the
pros and cons of the call-to-the-audience segment common to most
democratic governing bodies in this land.
However, it's definitely not a feature of meetings of the Amphi
School Board, which is ruled by a tight little cabal.
At any rate, during the Super's Council meeting, district personnel
wrote down the pros and cons on the issue as voiced by the participants,
and after the session reconvened to review. Members say they felt
the consensus was that there was some merit to instituting a call-to-the-audience
at board meetings.
At the April Super's Council, Smith announced that he wanted
to revisit the issue. Reading from a prepared script, he said
the consensus was that there should be no change in the policy.
Members report there was an uneasy silence. Finally, they say,
one annoyed parent announced she didn't think that was the consensus
at all.
Smith reportedly replied something to the effect that, "So
we want to keep things as they are with consideration of other
possibilities."
After more uneasy silence, Smith moved on to other issues, leaving
members feeling as if it was a done deal. No call-to-the-audience.
But if you're an Amphi parent interested in letting the cabal
know how you feel about the issue, the topic is currently scheduled
for discussion by the Board at the June 16 meeting, which begins
at 6 p.m.
Be warned, however, that Board President Mike Bernal has
promised several times to put call-to-the-audience on the agenda,
only to back out later. There's no guarantee he won't use the
same sleazy move again, but you can count on this: We'll be watching.
COP SHOP BE-BOP: Seems the Tucson Police Department
doesn't just take care of its own, but may extend its services
to other law-enforcement agencies too.
A Skinny reader reports an incident that's eerily similar to
that involving TPD Capt. Kevin Danaher, in which fellow
cops recently were punished for covering up his single-car accident.
This time, however, the incident involved a Sheriff's detective.
Magically, there's no record of the incident on file with the
Tucson Police Department, which would have been the investigating
agency.
On January 30, our reader was following a car down Tanque Verde
Road. She saw the car was weaving. At one point the reader observed
a Sheriff's patrol car pull up along side of the weaving vehicle,
and noted the drivers seemed to have some sort of communication
before parting.
Our reader continued to follow the weaving car as it went down
Tanque Verde, heading toward Wrightstown Road. She saw the car
almost hit a guardrail and the curb. Attempting to turn right
onto Wrightstown, the car veered all the way across the lane and
through the left-turn lane, over the median and into the oncoming
lane before it rolled over a bush on the side of the road. At
least two of the car's tires were flattened, and it was obviously
not going much farther.
Fearing the driver was hurt, our reader pulled over to see if
he needed help. At about the same time, she saw a man getting
out of the car. Apparently unhurt, he was wearing a sweatshirt
that said "Sheriff's Department" on the front. He was
also wearing a gun in a shoulder holster.
Feeling discretion was the better part of valor, our reader headed
to a nearby service station and called 911. She was informed hers
was the second call to come in on the accident.
Passing the same spot the next morning, our reader saw the car
was gone, and the only trace of the accident was the squashed
bush.
Finding nothing in the daily press, she called us with the car's
license number.
After many weeks of persistent calls on the our part, TPD Sgt.
Eugene Mejia says he can find no record of the 911 calls;
nor was he able to come up with an accident report. Mejia assures
us that if such an incident had happened, there would have been
a report.
Calls to Sheriff's Lt. Leo Duffner reveal that a Det.
Rodney Hamilton was, in fact, driving the car that evening
and was involved in a single-car accident.
And, in fact, a Tucson Police Department officer responded to
the scene.
Hamilton did the right thing and reported the incident to his
supervisor the next day. Duffner says he believes Hamilton's
explanation was that he was simply not paying attention and crashed.
They say they have no idea why TPD has no record of the 911 calls,
or an accident report. Duffner also says he's not sure this could
even be called a "traffic accident."
We'll never know. Although we can verify it happened, there's
no official TPD record that it did.
Makes us think that maybe Danaher's screw-up and the subsequent
attempted cover-up isn't an isolated incident.
ROSS HONORED IN SEATTLE: While The Arizona Daily Star
is shabbily treating outgoing Arizona Opera Director Glynn
Ross like an over-the-hill has-been, the folks in Seattle,
where Ross led that company for 20 glorious years, are bestowing
high honors upon him.
Seattle's Corporate Council for The Arts has extended to Ross
their Lifetime Accomplishment in the Arts Award for his work as
founding director of Seattle Opera. Over a thousand business,
civic, and arts leaders assembled to recognize Ross' accomplishments
at May 26 luncheon.
Glynn Ross was--and is--a class act. It's past time for Tucsonans
to similarly honor him.
|