NO INITIATIVE: As you may recall, Mayor George Miller
declared in his state-of-the-city address this year that he was
determined to annex the communities of Casas Adobes and the Catalina
Foothills. The first step, Miller said, was to change the City
Charter from the current system of electing City Council members
citywide to a ward-only system.
But a charter change requires voter approval. Miller hoped to
put the issue on the November ballot, but the City Council balked
at the plan, with only Republican Fred Ronstadt supporting
the change.
Frustrated by the Council's intransigence, Miller then announced
he would push an initiative to put the question to voters. Car
dealer/banker Jim Click agreed to raise money for the initiative,
which is being headed up by Tucson's last Republican mayor, Lew
Murphy.
But there's a problem: The City Charter only allows an initiative
every 12 months--and, since we had several initiatives on last
November's ballot, only 364 days will have passed before this
year's election day.
Last week, City Clerk Kathy Detrick declared that even
if the initiative backers gather enough signatures, the city can't
hold another referendum election until November 1999.
So, barring a legal challenge to Detrick's call, Miller's plan
has hit another setback.
CONFLICT CONVOLUTION: Real-estate agent Esther Underwood,
the ringleader of the yellow-ribbon-wearing parents who have pushed
the Amphi School District to build a new high school in
the midst of critical habitat for the endangered pygmy owl, rarely
finds fault with the majority of the Amphi Board.
Underwood has defended the outrageous price paid for the property,
and she hasn't uttered a peep about the egregious contract the
district signed with real-estate broker Bill Arnold, which
allowed Arnold to negotiate his own fees at the same time as he
was working out the amount of money the district would pay property
owners--an arrangement that has recently landed the district in
court.
But Underwood has finally found a "conflict of interest"
she's concerned about--namely, that Amphi Board member Nancy
Young Wright has been a passionate defender of our rapidly
vanishing desert.
In an op-ed in the Tucson Citizen last week, Underwood
whined that Wright--whom she described as a "rabid environmentalist"--had
ties to the Southwest Center for Biological Diversity,
and asked, "How can Wright sit in executive session with
other school board members discussing legal strategies against
her hiking buddies? Isn't that a huge conflict of interest?"
Well, no, Esther, unless you have some kind of evidence that
Wright is leaking information from those executive sessions to
the other side--which she denies doing. If Esther's got evidence
to the contrary, we'd love to see it.
Underwood demanded Wright's resignation, apparently because she
doesn't believe citizens should serve on the Amphi Board if they
don't agree with her.
In fact, Wright has not, as Underwood alleges, been serving an
environmental "master." Rather, she's been concerned
that federal law will prohibit construction of a school on this
site. For more than a year, she has asked the district to consider
alternatives to the site because there might be a quicker--and
cheaper--alternative way to get a school built.
Instead, the idiots in the majority on the Amphi Board have pushed
ahead with the plan to build the school in the owl habitat, culminating
in a tree-removal debacle two weeks ago, which was quickly halted
by a federal judge.
We'll find out who was right next week, when the school district
faces the environmentalists in federal court.
FROM ONE BROWN TO ANOTHER: Former Tucson City Manager Mike
Brown stacked City Hall with as many Californians as he could.
One of them was Sally Nagy, who was head of the Management
Information Department. Skinny sources tell us that Nagy grew
so obnoxious to city personnel that new City Manager Louis
Guttierez, usually inert, actually counseled her on her behavior.
Nagy was being moved closer to the door.
Now she's been hired by the other Mike Brown, Pima County's
presiding Superior Court judge. She's being paid $105,000 a year
to handle the court's computer system.
Putting aside whatever talent and managerial skill Nagy may have,
it's interesting to note that the many bureaucratic jobs in the
court system are still handled the old-fashioned way. The judiciary
basically runs a fiefdom independent of those rules and procedures--like
competitive tests, searches, etc.--that other governmental entities
must comply with. Gee, when the Board of Supes used to do business
that way, it was called "patronage."
Perhaps the county's newly formed "ethics" committee
would like to place judicial "pork" on their agenda.
GOP BACKSTABBING IN DISTRICT 12: Republican County Chair
Toni Hellon is the wife of GOP State Chair Mike Hellon,
who is also a GOP national committeeman. (So many titles in just
one household--imagine the pillow talk!)
Anyway, the Hellons and retiring GOP state Rep. Freddie Hershberger
aren't happy with the three candidates currently running for the
state House in District 12. So they're looking for somebody else
to get into the race already occupied by talk show host John
C. Scott, incumbent Dan Schottel, and Realtor Steve
Huffman, who lost his bid for the seat in 1996.
The Hellons and Herschberger have approached several folks, asking
them to jump in. It's no secret that Hershberger and Schottel
were never close, or that Huffman alienated Hershberger by including
her in a campaign mailer sent from Phoenix by an "independent"
group. Scott, meanwhile, is apparently too uncontrollable or too
conservative or too socially unacceptable or whatever. The Hellons
and Hershberger have always represented the "moderate"
(read "country-club") wing of the local GOP.
The Hellons' actions may not sit well with some other GOP types.
Party leaders usually don't spend their time jacking with incumbents
like Schottel--particularly when they've been having trouble filling
out the card to run for offices usually held by Democrats.
HOME OF THE RANGE: Here's something to keep in mind as
the Tucson Rod & Gun Club continues to fight its eviction
on federal land near Sabino Canyon:
We've been reading a lot about the latest attempt by U.S. Rep.
Jim Kolbe to secure a "compromise" between the
U.S. Forest Service and the gun club, which would find
a new home for the range on Forest Service land.
Most of the reporting on Kolbe's move has made it seem like the
new county-proposed shooting range--which will be paid for with
funds generated by the recent bond election--will be the substitute
for that controversial TR&G range in Sabino Canyon.
Wrong. The proposed range was actually meant to replace Pima
County's old range on Kinney Road, which--like the Sabino Canyon
range--has been encroached by developers and whining neighbors.
The Sabino Canyon Range should be replaced--at least when it
comes to long-range and loud rifle shooting--by another range
on federal land somewhere else.
But we generally agree with Kolbe--one would think they could
find 20 acres somewhere for people to shoot on.
TV NEWS 101: Ever watch Chicago's WGN news on cable?
Now there's a real station that's successful, right? So how come
they devote a great deal of time and effort to political coverage
of Illinois candidates and issues? You can see independent polling,
candidate debates, professional pundits giving analysis--the stuff
Tucson's news media once did before all those out-of-town bean
counters took over and decided nobody was interested.
Here's some free advice to the ratings losers at KGUN-TV,
Channel 9, and KOLD-TV, Channel 13: Fire all those
consultants, quit using the stupid focus groups, and park the
dumb chopper. Just try watching a real news operation by flipping
your remotes to WGN. And then take some notes--if you still remember
how to take notes--and ask yourselves the big question: If the
big-city guys are successful doing it the old-fashioned way (by
presenting real news), couldn't you be, too?
CLUELESS, OR JUST SUCKING UP TO MANAGEMENT? The
Arizona Daily Suckwad's "Northwest" section
has always been pathetic when it comes to news.
The masthead proclaims the paper is "serving" Oro Valley,
Marana, SaddleBrooke, Catalina, Flowing Wells, and Rancho Vistoso.
Notice anybody missing? How about the two newly incorporated towns
right in the middle--Tortolita and Casas Adobes?
While we recognize that the editorial powers at both local papers
opposed the incorporation of these two communities, don't you
think Tortolita and Casas Adobes are at least as geographically
relevant as places that aren't towns at all, like SaddleBrooke,
Catalina, Flowing Wells, and Rancho Vistoso? Aren't they communities
too, deserving of the same inadequate Suckwad "service?"
|