|
'200 Cigarettes' is a tumor-causing, memory-staining, smelly, plotless movie.
By James DiGiovanna
WHEN I RETURNED from a vacation last week, I found that
one of my cats had decided to use my down comforter as a urinal.
Then, for good measure, he used my other down comforter in a similar
manner, and topped off his artistic efforts by spraying some pillows
and a dust ruffle. Discovering and removing the pee-stained articles
was, on the whole, a much more entertaining and less humiliating
experience than watching 200 Cigarettes.
The basic idea of this film is that there are a dozen or so people
wandering around New York's lower east side on New Year's Eve
1981. They cross paths, switch partners, and all wind up at the
same party.
Actually, the basic idea of this film was to round up as many
hot young stars as possible in the hopes of duping the pseudo-hipster
MTV audience into coming to the movie and pretending they liked
it. To that end, Christina Ricci, Ben Affleck, Casey Affleck,
Dave Chappelle, Gaby Hoffman, Martha Plimpton, Courtney Love,
Jay Mohr and Janeane Garofalo are tortured with dialogue that
manages to be simultaneously boring and excruciatingly embarrassing.
This is no doubt a difficult combination, and one for which screenwriter
Shana Larsen (whose veteran scriptwriting credits include 200
Cigarettes and 200 Cigarettes) should be deeply mortified.
Although the blame doesn't lie exclusively with the tyro efforts
of Larsen. Instead of hiring a director who had actually, I don't
know, some experience or training in directing movies, production
company MTV (you may remember them from such high-brow work as
Road Rules and Real World) put this project under
the control of casting director Risa Bramon Garcia. Garcia has
never directed a film before in her life, and it shows. I guess
a casting director just assumes that if you assemble a dozen young
actors with buzz, then the job is done; just point the camera
while they walk around and make poop jokes.
Yes, there's the obligatory poop joke in this film. Someone must
stop this. I do not want to see any more feces clinging to a character's
clothing. George of the Jungle, Dr. Dolittle, Nutty Professor,
Flubber, My Favorite Martian and now 200 Cigarettes
have all assaulted us with excrement. This is probably the worst
trend in cinema since the demise of the ape movie.
After a while I was able to block out the feculence and focus
on the other faults of this film. First off, while it was supposed
to be set in 1981, most of the women in the cast were wearing
the kind of vintage dresses that didn't become popular until the
late '80s. The men all had long sideburns, which, while currently
de rigueur for young Hollywood stud boys, were hardly universal
at the time--the trendy look was to shave the sideburns embarrassingly
high. Nobody in the cast had the kind of 1930s-style Kafka-do
that was ubiquitous amongst the proto-club kids who hung around
N.Y.'s alphabet city at the time. And while some of the characters
were dressed in properly punk fashion, the original music played
by the on-screen bands was decidedly grunge influenced, an unheard-of
sound in those environs at that time.
This may seem picayune, but when a movie is set in a particular
period, it's either for a historical reason or to recreate the
ambiance of that time. Since there was no historical purpose for
the temporal setting, one assumes it was supposed to be a nostalgia
piece; if that's the case they could at least try to get the details
straight.
Of course, when a viewer is able to focus on such trivialities,
there's something wrong with the rest of the movie, which should
have been busy distracting him with something that used to be
called "plot." In fact, when some pony-tailed victim
of consumer culture in the audience decided to use his cell phone
during the movie, it provided a welcome distraction, and though
his call consisted of little more than, "I can't really talk
right now... yeah...yeah...," (which he felt obliged to shout
into the receiver) it was considerably more entertaining than
what was happening on screen.
What's so infuriating about a movie like this is the way it's
designed to sucker viewers. Because they aimed so squarely at
a crowd who currently think retro-'80s is hip, and who no doubt
are big Affleck fans, the producers saw no reason to pay for a
real script or director. The half-dozen stories that meandered
through 200 Cigarettes all seemed to be gleaned from the
scattered pieces found on the cutting room floors of other movies:
a man and a woman who are best friends realize they are in love;
two teenagers go to the big city and get lost on the way to a
party, but manage to find romance; a woman gives a party and no
one comes; two women who are best friends fall for the same guy.
I kept imagining we were actually seeing these characters in-between
scenes from a real movie, where they had something interesting
to say and some purpose to their actions.
If that movie is ever found and released, then 200 Cigarettes
could turn out to be the Rosenkrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead
of the retro-hip world, but right now it looks more like the most
forgettable film of the year--for those who didn't have to suffer
through it.
200 Cigarettes is playing at Century Gateway (792-9000),
Century Park (620-0750) and Foothills (742-6174)
cinemas.
|
|