Critics around the world have been
hailing Russian Ark as a
masterpiece of experimental cinema.
Perhaps, unlike me, those critics stayed
past the intolerably amateurish and
embarrassingly pretentious first 30
minutes and found something to like
about this so-called "movie." The premise
seemed interesting: one single take, with
no cuts, as the film moves in real-time
through Russia’s Hermitage museum.
Sadly, the camera seems to be in the
hands of the producer’s mentally
diminished nephew. It's probably the worst
cinematography I’ve ever seen outside of
those hidden-camera gay-porn videos I
used to blackmail John Ashcroft. Parts of
the frame are frequently blocked out by
walls and doorways, the pans are
painfully ragged and directionless, and in
a comically bad moment, a painting that
is being discussed is invisible due to
glare that could easily have been avoided
if the camera had just moved five freaking
feet to the left. All this is accented by a
script that is so cute and pretentious it
could only have been written by the
brain-damaged love-child of Dick Cavett
and Hello Kitty. With the advent of digital
video, anyone can make a feature-length
film, and Russian Ark shows that
this is a very bad thing indeed.